Steve Bate
American living in Southern France.
Posts
@silverpill@mitra.social @mariusor@metalhead.club @trwnh@mastodon.social
This FEP introduces new requirements to ActivityPub, and I will probably add more in the future. Does that make it non conformant?
Not at all. I was referring to the Add without an object to create a collection (instead of Create/Collection, I assume).
@silverpill@mitra.social @mariusor@metalhead.club @trwnh@mastodon.social In principle, I like the general idea, but I think it’s misleading to call this an “ActivityPub” server FEP since it doesn’t conform to the ActivityPub specifications. You also recommend (require?) using the result property to describe server side-effects, but you don’t describe how. I don’t know how you expect to “force clients to specify them”.
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io Sounds good! Thanks for providing that service. I didn’t fully understand the issue about the CIMD hostname. How is that related to the client_name property in the CIMD (if present)?
I'm curious what other devs think about this. If an actor posts an C2S #ActivityPub Create/Note to the outbox, what would you think if the object created by the server was a different type (e.g., Article)?
@django@social.coop
> bob decides his Post should be stand alone... Too bad json-ld has trouble with this, from a c2s perspective
I'm curious what the JSON-LD/C2S issue is with the scenario.
TIL that Accept headers with a ":" cause surprising CORS behavior (the header is no longer "safelisted"). Beware of that when accepting the standard #ActivityPub (via AS2) `application/ld+json; profile="https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"` content type. You've been warned. 😉(Note that you might see the http URL above automatically hyperlinked in your Fedi client.)